Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos4,612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anti Fascism results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 2,080 hits. Analysis detected 18,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,836 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,325 of 16,562 topics). This Anti Fascism is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Anti Fascism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,836
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.4%14.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.0%15.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos