Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antelope Valley results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,748 hits. Analysis detected 9,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,319 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,000 of 16,090 topics). This Antelope Valley is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Antelope Valley
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠57%Antelope Valley (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 8,319
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.0%21.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.4%14.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos