Topic summary
53% 2 analyzed articles/videos 985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animation History results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 797 hits . Analysis detected 5,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,529 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (9,279 of 16,562 topics). This Animation History is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Animation History
Topic details
Total words: 5,529
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst