Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Animals In War results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 3,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,886 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Animals In War is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Animals In War
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,886
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 15.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos