Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Services results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 662 hits. Analysis detected 2,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,941 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,443 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Services is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Animal Services
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,941
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 21.8%21.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 34.1%34.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.1%11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 34.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos