Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Reproduction results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 548 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,347 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,857 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Reproduction is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Animal Reproduction
Topic details
Total words: 1,347
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos