Topic summary
⁠28%4 analyzed articles/videos2,399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Intelligence results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 755 hits. Analysis detected 9,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,976 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,364 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Intelligence is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Animal Intelligence
Topic details
Total words: 10,976
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos