Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Antics results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 1,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 978 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,381 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Antics is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Animal Antics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 978
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles978 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 45.5%45.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 45.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.6%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos