Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Arrest results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 668 hits. Analysis detected 3,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,575 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,883 of 16,562 topics). This Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Arrest is worse (more manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Arrest
Topic details
Total words: 1,575
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510088.6% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 42.4%42.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 18.7%18.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 24.7%24.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.1%27.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 42.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Red Herring: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.7%Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos