Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ancient Dna Analysis results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 1,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,788 of 16,562 topics). This Ancient Dna Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Ancient Dna Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 1,808
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.1% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.3%19.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.6%12.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos