Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anaheim results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 456 hits. Analysis detected 2,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ā 64% (5,988 of 16,562 topics). This Anaheim is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Anaheim
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 64%Anaheim (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.8% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.4%3.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos