Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Griffin results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,093 hits. Analysis detected 7,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,672 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,235 of 16,480 topics). This Amy Griffin is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Amy Griffin
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,672
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos