Topic summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amnesty International results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 747 hits. Analysis detected 5,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,458 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,624 of 16,562 topics). This Amnesty International is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Amnesty International
Topic details
Total words: 4,458
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos