Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Indian Wars results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 257 hits. Analysis detected 2,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,813 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,423 of 15,898 topics). This American Indian Wars is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
American Indian Wars
Topic details
Total words: 3,813
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos