Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Heroes results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,546 hits. Analysis detected 8,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,011 of 16,562 topics). This American Heroes is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
American Heroes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.2%15.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos