Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Dining results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Status Quo Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50.8% saturation with 1,733 hits. Analysis detected 7,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,414 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,775 of 16,562 topics). This American Dining is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
American Dining
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,414
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.3% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 50.8%50.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 35.9%35.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 19.4%19.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 30.7%30.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Topic 50.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 35.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos