Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Art results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 1,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,363 of 16,562 topics). This American Art is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
American Art
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,308
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos