Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Blair results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 966 hits . Analysis detected 7,721 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,820 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,539 of 6,264 authors). This Elizabeth Blair is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Elizabeth Blair
Author details
Total words: 9,820
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst