Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ambassador results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 521 hits. Analysis detected 2,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,858 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Ambassador is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ambassador
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,858
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos