Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video296 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alysa Liu results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52% saturation with 462 hits. Analysis detected 2,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (717 of 16,562 topics). This Alysa Liu is worse (more manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Alysa Liu
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.7% percentile
13.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles888 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 43.9%43.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 52.0%52.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 35.6%35.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 31.6%31.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 50.6%50.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.0%9.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 52.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 50.6%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 43.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 35.6%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 31.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Red Herring: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Personal Incredulity: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.6%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos