Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Altmed results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 2,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,170 of 16,097 topics). This Altmed is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Altmed
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.4%7.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.5%3.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos