Fox News88%

Taxpayer spending on 'exorcisms' derails Senate testimony: 'What the hell are we doing about it?' 46%

By Elaine Mallon0%

5/21/2026, 10:00:18 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 1,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 468 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,035 of 20,452 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the article peer group.

Sen. 
John Kennedy, R-La., railed against California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, which is facing scrutiny from the Trump administration over fraud allegations, as Kennedy highlighted reports during a Tuesday hearing that the state covers exorcisms and other faith-based healing practices. 
Medi-Cal’s spending practices have faced growing scrutiny as California’s Medicaid spending has more than doubled since 2019, rising from roughly $100.7 billion to a projected $222 billion in 2026. 
Just last week, the Trump administration suspended $1.4 billion in federal funding for California home health and hospice programs after Vice President J.D. 
Vance’s anti-fraud task force identified an estimated $600 million in suspected fraud within the state's Medicaid system. 
Kennedy alleged during his line of questioning to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche that taxpayer dollars were being used to cover the cost of exorcisms, a religious practice most commonly associated with the Catholic Church, and other indigenous spiritual practices. 
LAWMAKERS IN DEEP BLUE STATE DEMAND AUDIT OVER SKYROCKETING HEALTHCARE COSTS: 'ALARMING NATURE' 
"California's got 12% of the population in the last ten years," Kennedy told Blanche. 
"They're responsible for half of these new so-called health providers to provide exorcisms and other things. 
Now, what the hell are we doing about it? 
Why has this gone on for so long?" 
Reports that California provides Medicaid coverage for exorcisms and other spiritual rituals were first reported by The Wall Street Journal. 
In 2024, Medi-Cal expanded coverage for recipients seeking traditional healers and natural helpers within tribal communities. 
Services covered by taxpayer dollars include music therapy and spiritual interventions such as ceremonies, rituals and herbal remedies, according to a press release from Gov. 
Gavin Newsom's office. 
To be recognized by the state as a traditional healer, a person must have served as a spiritual leader within an American Indian tribe for at least two years and be contracted by an Indian Health Care Provider. 
Meanwhile, the requirement for a natural helper is less stringent and can apply to anyone considered a "trusted" member of an American Indian tribe. 
Newsom said this expansion of coverage for tribal medicine was made to assist in "helping heal the historical wounds inflicted on tribes." 
"Like many of the issues that plague successive generations of Native people, those inequities can be traced back to the historical atrocities the U.S. inflicted on tribes across the country," Newsom said in a press release announcing the Medi-Cal expansion. 
"By supporting greater access to traditional medicine and healing, we are taking another step toward a healthier, brighter future." 
It remains unclear how much Medi-Cal has spent covering services provided by traditional healers or natural helpers. 
The California Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to Fox News Digital's questions by the time of publication. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.1%Elaine Mallon: 2.5%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias20.1%This article: 3.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias3.0%This article: 14.3%Elaine Mallon: 2.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic14.3%This article: 6.2%Elaine Mallon: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.2%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 3.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 28.0%Elaine Mallon: 5.6%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect28.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%Elaine Mallon: 1.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias12.2%This article: 1.7%Elaine Mallon: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.7%This article: 31.0%Elaine Mallon: 6.0%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias31.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 2.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 1.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.5%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Elaine Mallon: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Elaine Mallon: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias4.9%This article: 7.5%Elaine Mallon: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect7.5%This article: 3.6%Elaine Mallon: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias3.6%This article: 4.5%Elaine Mallon: 4.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem4.5%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.4%Elaine Mallon: 3.2%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority12.4%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.2%Elaine Mallon: 4.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization16.2%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.8%Elaine Mallon: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.8%This article: 32.3%Elaine Mallon: 4.9%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion32.3%This article: 9.4%Elaine Mallon: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question9.4%This article: 19.7%Elaine Mallon: 2.7%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.7%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 14.1%Elaine Mallon: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof14.1%This article: 8.5%Elaine Mallon: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature8.5%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.7%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 29.5%Elaine Mallon: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)29.5%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 22.4%Elaine Mallon: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote22.4%This article: 6.0%Elaine Mallon: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection6.0%This article: 14.1%Elaine Mallon: 1.9%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice14.1%This article: 4.7%Elaine Mallon: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination4.7%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Elaine Mallon: 2.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Elaine Mallon: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

468 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers74%attributed speech123writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Kennedy • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageJ.D. Vance • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kennedy • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Kennedy • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kennedy • 16 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Kennedy • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Kennedy • 8 words • 0.0% coverageThe Wall Street Journal • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Department of Health and Human Services • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageGavin Newsom's office • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Department of Health and Human Services • 38 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Department of Health and Human Services • 24 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 22 words • 100.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 40 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

John Kennedy

100%flagged-word coverage
125 attributed words36% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+5.0 ptsWriter: 39.8%John Kennedy: 44.8%44.8%Politically Right Leaning +30.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Kennedy: 30.4%30.4%Biased Writer Voice+7.6 ptsWriter: 22.8%John Kennedy: 30.4%30.4%Quote-first Misdirection-22.8 ptsWriter: 22.8%John Kennedy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.