Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Allyship results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 880 hits . Analysis detected 5,047 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,434 of 16,250 topics). This Allyship is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Allyship
Topic details
Total words: 4,640
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 19.0% 19.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst