Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alicia Keys results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 1,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,389 of 16,562 topics). This Alicia Keys is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Alicia Keys
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos