Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Algorithmic Trading results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 64.1% saturation with 141 hits . Analysis detected 926 faulty-reasoning hits from 220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.2% and a BS Rank of 99% (174 of 16,562 topics). This Algorithmic Trading is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Algorithmic Trading
Topic details
Total words: 220
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.0% percentile 22.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles220 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 64.1% 64.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 54.5% 54.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 51.4% 51.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 36.4% 36.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 25.0% 25.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 22.3% 22.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 20.9% 20.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 64.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 54.5%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Topic 51.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 36.4%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 20.9%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.1%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst