Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Albinism results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 1,370 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,566 of 15,988 topics). This Albinism is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Albinism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,796
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos