Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Airport Restaurants results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 738 hits. Analysis detected 5,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,433 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,456 of 15,269 topics). This Airport Restaurants is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Airport Restaurants
Topic details
Total words: 4,433
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.8% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos