Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Air Combat results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 546 hits. Analysis detected 3,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,250 of 16,562 topics). This Air Combat is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Air Combat
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos