Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Air Canada results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 642 faulty-reasoning hits from 580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (288 of 16,562 topics). This Air Canada is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Air Canada
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510098.3% percentile
18.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles580 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 45.5%45.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 18.8%18.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.1%24.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 45.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 18.8%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.3%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos