Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aids results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 1,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,628 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,318 of 16,562 topics). This Aids is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Aids
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,628
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos