Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aid Cuts results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 2,204 hits. Analysis detected 7,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,518 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,572 of 15,766 topics). This Aid Cuts is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Aid Cuts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,518
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 48.8%48.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 32.8%32.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.6%7.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 48.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 32.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos