Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Aid And Development results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 1,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Aid And Development is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Aid And Development
Topic details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos