Topic summary
⁠97%2 analyzed articles/videos768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Training Data results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 841 hits. Analysis detected 4,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,307 of 16,345 topics). This Ai Training Data is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Ai Training Data
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,304
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 29.3%29.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 36.5%36.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 11.8%11.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.8%13.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 36.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 29.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos