Topic summary
79%1 analyzed article/video624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Limitations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 2,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 77% (3,780 of 15,919 topics). This AI Limitations is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
AI Limitations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.3% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.0%31.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.8%13.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 18.0%18.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos