Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Industry Trends results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 759 hits. Analysis detected 5,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,459 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Industry Trends is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Ai Industry Trends
Topic details
Total words: 5,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos