Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nilesh Christopher results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 5,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,226 of 6,628 authors). This Nilesh Christopher is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Nilesh Christopher
Author details
Total words: 5,236
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst