Topic summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Industry results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 295 hits . Analysis detected 2,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,941 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,018 of 16,562 topics). This AI Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. AI Industry
Topic details
Total words: 1,941
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Middle Ground: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst