Author summary
56% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Bort results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,010 hits . Analysis detected 12,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,716 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,294 of 6,628 authors). This Julie Bort is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group. Julie Bort
Author details
Total words: 11,716
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.9% 7.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst