Daniel Ek's body-scanning startup Neko Health raises another $700M 52%

By Julie Bort56%

7/15/2026, 7:46:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 470 faulty-reasoning hits from 296 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (10,632 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the article peer group.

Daniel Ek’s body-scanning startup Neko Health raises another $700M 
Neko Health, the body-scanning and health assessment startup founded by Spotify’s Daniel Ek (pictured above, right) and his co-founder Hjalmar Nilsonne (above, left), has raised a $700 million Series C. 
The round was led by Lightspeed Venture Partners and O.G. 
Venture Partners. 
This follows the company's $260 million Series B raised in January 2025. 
Neko Health has developed proprietary body-scanning technology, which it couples with bloodwork, to assess a person’s health. 
For gym lovers, the scan also now includes body composition information. 
It can couple the assessment with Apple Health data, which Nilsonne says gives its medical clinicians real-world data to use in its assessments. 
Neko Health, which has locations in the U.K. and Sweden, is preparing for its first U.S. location in New York. 
The company says more than 100,000 people have already had scans and more than 350,000 people have either registered for the waitlist or set an appointment. 
One of the people who had a Neko Health scan is Calm founder Alex Tew. 
He posted on X that it found a malignant mole on his back, which he promptly had removed. 
“I’m grateful to Neko for helping me discover this  I’m not sure how I would have otherwise.” 
Neko Health isn’t the only health scanning company founded by tech folks. 
Midjourney, the AI Lab best known for its AI image and video creation model and website, is also creating a body scanner, which it plans to integrate into a spa experience with hot tubs and saunas, opening in San Francisco sometime in 2027. 
Other investors in Neko Health’s latest round include Atomico, General Catalyst, Lakestar, Liberty City Ventures, Positive Sum, and BDT & MSD. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.9%Julie Bort: 4.1%TechCrunch: 3.0%Confirmation Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 2.7%TechCrunch: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Julie Bort: 7.5%TechCrunch: 3.5%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 14.5%Julie Bort: 2.4%TechCrunch: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic14.5%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 1.2%TechCrunch: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 3.9%TechCrunch: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Julie Bort: 4.4%TechCrunch: 4.8%Framing Effect10.1%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.8%Julie Bort: 1.2%TechCrunch: 0.6%Status Quo Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Julie Bort: 4.2%TechCrunch: 4.9%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 1.0%TechCrunch: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Julie Bort: 5.4%TechCrunch: 5.0%Negativity Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 3.0%TechCrunch: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.9%TechCrunch: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Julie Bort: 8.6%TechCrunch: 3.5%Halo Effect12.8%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Julie Bort: 4.1%TechCrunch: 2.3%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 32.8%Julie Bort: 7.9%TechCrunch: 4.4%Appeal to Authority32.8%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 1.5%TechCrunch: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 6.9%TechCrunch: 6.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 3.8%TechCrunch: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.1%Julie Bort: 2.0%TechCrunch: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion6.1%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.9%TechCrunch: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.1%Julie Bort: 4.0%TechCrunch: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.1%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.8%TechCrunch: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.7%TechCrunch: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 26.0%Julie Bort: 3.6%TechCrunch: 2.4%Anecdotal26.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%Julie Bort: 3.4%TechCrunch: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 4.5%TechCrunch: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.5%TechCrunch: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 7.3%TechCrunch: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.8%TechCrunch: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Julie Bort: 3.6%TechCrunch: 4.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

296 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers29%attributed speech211writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageHjalmar Nilsonne • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageNeko Health • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Tew • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAlex Tew • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Alex Tew

100%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words42% of attributed speech85% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.