Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Warfare results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 502 hits. Analysis detected 3,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,663 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,654 of 16,562 topics). This Ai In Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Ai In Warfare
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,663
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos