Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos2,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Marketing results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,070 hits. Analysis detected 17,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,721 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,210 of 15,757 topics). This Ai In Marketing is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Ai In Marketing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,721
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.9%10.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.3%16.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos