Topic summary
⁠98%2 analyzed articles/videos1,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In Finance results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 810 hits. Analysis detected 7,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,056 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,728 of 16,562 topics). This Ai In Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Ai In Finance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,056
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.2%19.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.0%20.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos