Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Impact On Skills results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 3,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,276 of 16,558 topics). This Ai Impact On Skills is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Ai Impact On Skills
Topic details
Total words: 3,808
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos