Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Impact On Jobs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 587 hits. Analysis detected 4,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,675 of 16,562 topics). This AI Impact On Jobs is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
AI Impact On Jobs
Topic details
Total words: 2,268
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 25.9%25.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.0%13.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.3%15.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 25.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Middle Ground: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos