Topic summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Impact On Employment results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 5,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,949 of 16,562 topics). This AI Impact On Employment is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
AI Impact On Employment
Topic details
Total words: 5,176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos