Topic summary
75%3 analyzed articles/videos1,645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Image Generation results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 917 hits. Analysis detected 6,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,225 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,743 of 16,302 topics). This Ai Image Generation is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Ai Image Generation
Topic details
Total words: 6,225
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.0%14.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate