Topic summary
⁠22%3 analyzed articles/videos2,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Assistants results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 697 hits. Analysis detected 7,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,539 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,187 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Assistants is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Ai Assistants
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,539
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos