Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agriculture Impact results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 2,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (7,916 of 15,787 topics). This Agriculture Impact is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Agriculture Impact
Topic details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos