Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Bottar results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 384 hits . Analysis detected 2,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,582 of 6,353 authors). This Abigail Bottar is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Abigail Bottar
Author details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.1% 8.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.2% 9.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst