Topic summary
75% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agricultural Labor results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,813 hits . Analysis detected 12,936 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,505 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (10,566 of 16,562 topics). This Agricultural Labor is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Agricultural Labor
Topic details
Total words: 11,505
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.2% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst